Public health of the nation and reproductive violence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2025.76.57-64

Keywords:

public health, human rights, human rights violations, judicial protection mechanism, forced abortion, forced sterilization

Abstract

Background. The article examines a separate area of ensuring the reproductive health of the nation - protection of society from reproductive violence, which is broadly understood to include not only manifestations of sexual violence, but also aspects related to forced abortion, forced sterilization, legal prohibition of contraception, etc. The legal mechanism for combating reproductive violence, including public health regulations, prohibition of violence and a set of guarantees that form law-respectful behavior in the reproductive sphere, is defined.
Objective of the study: comprehensive analysis of the nation’s reproductive health problems by identifying methods and means of combating reproductive violence through legal mechanisms.
Materials and methods. The disclosure of the subject of the study requires the use of an intercomplex approach that absorbs knowledge from several areas of scientific knowledge - medicine, jurisprudence, sociology, political science, and ethics. The method of dogmatic analysis was used to study the incidents of legal proceedings related to human rights violations and institutional means of their protection; the comparative method was used to compare the role of individual means of influence on the country’s reproductive and preventive policies.
Results. The concept of reproductive violence is defined and distinguished from other related concepts; the state mechanism for combating reproductive violence as devaluing behavior that affects the reproductive health of the nation is formed; certain forms of reproductive violence are considered and the effectiveness of institutional and judicial mechanisms for combating this type of violence is determined.
Conclusions. Reproductive violence is broader than sexual violence, as it additionally includes violations of reproductive autonomy or reproductive capacity and is represented by such forms as forced pregnancy, forced sterilization, forced abortion, forced contraception, genital mutilation/circumcision, child marriage, and control over pregnancy outcomes. The analysis of the legislation and practice of a number of countries (the USA, India, Sweden, Austria, Ukraine, Ireland, France, the Netherlands, Germany, Canada, Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain, Mexico, Brazil, Malta, Portugal, etc.) has made it possible to state that reproductive health issues in the states often remain outside the focus of the lawmaker and the mechanisms for protecting human rights subjects from reproductive violence are insufficient.

Author Biographies

V.B. Kovalchuk, National University «Lviv Polytechnic», Lviv

doctor of juridical science, professor, head of the Department of Theory of Law and Constitutionalism, Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Education

І. І. Komarnytska, National University «Lviv Polytechnic», Lviv

doctor of juridical science, professor, Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Education

O.V. Rizenko, National University «Lviv Polytechnic», Lviv

PhD, associate professor, Department of Administrative and Informational Law, Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Education

V.M. Pasternak, National University «Lviv Polytechnic», Lviv

PhD, senior lecturer, Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Institute of Jurisprudence, Psychology and Innovative Education

I.M. Kostiukova, O.O. Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

assistant, Department of Descriptive and Clinical Anatomy

References

  1. Balinskaya O M, Teremetsky VI, Zharovskaya I, et al. The patient’s right to confidentiality in healthcare. Georgian Medical News. 2021; 12 (321): 147–53.
  2. Sasmito P, Prasetya FI, Yektiningtyastuti Y, et al. Public Health Center Emergency Referral Quality Analysis: Based on National Standard. International Journal of Public Health Excellence (IJPHE). 2024;3(2):520–7. DOI: 10.55299/ijphe.v3i2.757
  3. Sasie SD, Ayano G, Van Zuylen P, et al. Developing a comprehensive framework for evaluating public health emergency management program implementation: A scoping review. Public Health. 2025;239:22–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.12.012
  4. Quesada-Cubo V, Damián-González DC, Prado-Velasco FG, et al. The elimination of trachoma as a public health problem in Mexico: From national health priority to national success story. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2022; 16(8):e0010660. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010660
  5. Wang Y, Zhao L, Gao L, et al. Health policy and public health implications of obesity in China. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2021; 9(7): 446–61. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00118-2
  6. Bowleg L. Evolving intersectionality within public health: From analysis to action. American Journal of Public Health. 2021; 111(1):88–90. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306031
  7. Santana S, Brach, C, Harris, L, et al. Updating health literacy for Healthy People 2030: Defining its importance for a new decade in public health. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021 Nov-Dec;27 (Supp 6): S258–S264. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001324
  8. Gómez CA, Kleinman D, Pronk N, et al. Addressing health equity and social determinants of health through Healthy People 2030. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021 Nov-Dec;27 (Supp 6): S249–S257. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001297
  9. Lynch I, Macleod, C. I, Chiweshe, M. T, et al. Vulnerable youth or vulnerabilising contexts? A critical review of youth sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) policies in Eastern and Southern Africa. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2024. Sep 11. DOI: 10.1007/s13178-024-01018-y
  10. Ninsiima LR, Chiumia IK, Ndejjo R. Factors influencing access to and utilisation of youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Reprod Health. 2021;18:135. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01183-y
  11. Katwan E, Bisoborwa G, Butron-Riveros B, et al. Creating a global legal and policy database and document repository: Challenges and lessons learned from the World Health Organization Sexual, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health Policy Survey. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2415–21. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021
  12. Hawkins SS, Ghiani M, Harper S, et al. Impact of state-level changes on maternal mortality: A population-based, quasi-experimental study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2020;58:165–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.09.012
  13. Hennegan J, Winkler I T, Bobel, et al. Menstrual health: a definition for policy, practice, and research. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):31–38. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1911618
  14. Altunjan T. The International Criminal Court and Sexual Violence: Between Aspirations and Reality. German Law Journal. 2021 Aug 6;22(5):878–93. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2021.45
  15. Guterres A. Sexual violence is a threat to every individual’s right to a life of dignity, and to humanity’s collective peace and security [Internet]. United Nations Secretary-General, New York. 2017, 19 March. Available from: https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/conflict-related-sexual-violence
  16. Ochani K, Siddiqui, A, Ochani, S. An insight on gender-based violence. Health Science Reports. 2024;7(1):e1815. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1815
  17. Ruiz-Pérez I, Pastor-Moreno G. Measures to contain gender-based violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gac Sanit. 2021;35(4):389–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.04.005
  18. Sheeran N, Vallury K, Sharman LS, et al. Reproductive coercion and abuse among pregnancy counselling clients in Australia: Trends and directions. Reprod Health. 2022, 19(1):170. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01479-7
  19. Sheeran N, Jenkins A, Humphreys T, et al. Investigating the Impact of Reproductive Coercion and Intimate Partner Violence on Psychological and Sexual Wellbeing. J Interpers Violence. 2025 Feb;40(3-4):726–55. DOI: 10.1177/08862605241253026
  20. Horney J.A, Fleury-Steiner R, Camphausen LC, et al. Characterizing the impacts of public health control measures on domestic violence services: qualitative interviews with domestic violence coalition leaders. BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 5;23(1):1721. DOI: 1186/s12889-023-16471-4
  21. Human Rights Campaign. An epidemic of violence 2021: fatal violence against transgender and gender non-conforming people in the United States in 2021. [Internet]. Human Rights Campaign. 2021. Available from:: https://www.hrc.org/resources/fatal-violence-against-the-transgender-and-gender-non-conforming-community-in-2021
  22. Sherman ADF, Balthazar M, Klepper M, et al. Approach and avoidant coping among Black transgender women who have experienced violence: a qualitative analysis. Psychol Serv. 2022; 19: 45–61. DOI: 10.1037/ser0000581
  23. Berke DS, Collins ML. Toward a community-led, public health approach to multilevel violence prevention for Black and Brown transgender and gender-diverse communities. Am J Public Health. 2023 Jun;113(S2):S115–S118. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307221
  24. Ramasubramani P, Krishnamoorthy Y, Vijayakumar K, Rushender R. Burden, trend and determinants of various forms of domestic violence among reproductive age-group women in India: findings from nationally representative surveys. J Public Health. 2024;4(1):e1–e14. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad178
  25. Gama A, Pedro AR, Leote de Carvalho MJ, et al. Domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal. Port J Public Health, 2021;38(Suppl. 1):32–40. DOI: 10.1159/000514341
  26. Grey R. The ICC’s First ‘Forced Pregnancy’ Case in Historical Perspective. J Int Criminal Justice. 2017;15(5):906. DOI:10.1093/jicj/mqx051
  27. Laverty C, de Vos D. Reproductive Violence as a Category of Analysis: Disentangling the Relationship between ‘the Sexual’ and ‘the Reproductive’ in Transitional Justice, Int J Transit Justice. 2021;15(3):616–35. DOI: 10.1093/ijtj/ijab022
  28. Grose RG, Chen JS, RoofKA, et al. Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes of Violence Against Women and Girls in Lower-Income Countries: A Review of Reviews. J Sex Research. 2020;58(1):1–20. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1707466
  29. Yoshioka E, Palatino M, Nazareno J, Operario D. Intimate partner violence and sexual agency in a nationally representative sample of women and girls in the Philippines. J Int Violence. 2022;37(11–12):NP8867–NP8889. DOI: 10.1177/0886260520976208
  30. Laverty C, de Vos D. Ntaganda’ in Colombia: Intra-Party Reproductive Violence at the Colombian Constitutional Court [Internet]. Opinio Juris. 2020 Feb 25. Available from: http://opiniojuris.org/2020/02/25/ntaganda-in-colombia-intra-party-reproductive-violence-at-the-colombian-constitutional-court/
  31. Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women. Proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 48/104 of 20 December 1993. [Internet]. Available from: https://www. un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.21_declaration%20elimination%20vaw.pdf
  32. Tarzia L, Hegarty K. A conceptual re-evaluation of reproductive coercion: centring intent, fear and control. Reprod Health 2021;18:87. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01143-6
  33. Grace KT, Anderson JC. Reproductive coercion: a systematic review. TVA. 2018; 19(4): 371–90. DOI: 10.1177/1524838016663935
  34. Blikhar M, Dufeniuk O, Blikhar V. The Philosophy of the European Court of Human Rights: Axiological Paradigm. Beytulhikme. 2020. 10(2)2:355-71. DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1559
  35. Oliinyk Y, Shchyrba M, Shulhan I, at all. State legal regulation and patient autonomy in the field of reproductive health. Reprod endocrinol. 2024:5(74):73–9. DOI: 10.18370/2309-4117.2024.74.73-79
  36. Blikhar M, Skovronska I, Shyshko V, et al. Institutional stability of public administration in the conditions of increasing economic and legal challenges and threats of financial and economic and socio-political crisis in Ukraine. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice. 2023; 3(50):372–81. DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.3.50.2023.4087
  37. Johnson CG. Female inmates sterilized in California prisons without approval. [Internet]. Reveal. 2013 July 7. Available from: https://revealnews.org/article/female-inmates-sterilized-in-california-prisons-without-approval/
  38. Ice detainees faced medical neglect and hysterectomies, whistleblower alleges [Internet]. The Guardian. 2021. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/14/ice-detainees-hysterectomies-medical-neglect-irwin-georgia
  39. Ma L. Bringing the law home: abortion, reproductive coercion, and the family in early twentieth-century China. Women’s History Review. 2020; 30(6):990–1008. DOI: 10.1080/09612025.2020.1833496
  40. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008 [Internet]. WHO. 2011. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-and-regional-estimates-of-the-incidence-of-unsafe-abortion-and-associated-mortality
  41. Oluseye A, Waterhouse P, Hoggart L. ‘I really wanted to abort’ Desire for abortion, failed abortion and forced motherhood in South-Western Nigeria. Global Public Health, 2021; 17(8):1564–1577. DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1944264
  42. Keegan G, Francis M, Chalmers K, et al. Trauma of abortion restrictions and forced pregnancy: urgent implications for acute care surgeons. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023 Jan 4;8(1):e001067.
  43. Associated Press. Absolutely heartbreaking’: texans seeking abortions forced to travel for hours. [Internet]. The Guardian. 2021. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/oct/14/abortion-texas-pregnancy-long-drives
  44. Kimport K. Reducing the burdens of forced abortion travel: Referrals, financial and emotional support, and opportunities for positive experiences in traveling for third-trimester abortion care. Soc Sci Med. 2022;293:114667. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114667
  45. Murray L, Khan N. The im/mobilities of ‘sometimes-migrating’ for abortion: Ireland to Great Britain. Mobilities, 2020; 15(2): 1–12. DOI:10.1080/17450101.2020.1730637
  46. Sentencia SU599/19. Bogotá D.C. Once (11) de diciembre de dos mil diecinueve, 2019 [Internet]. IHL Databases. 2019. Available from: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/national-practice/constitutional-court-judgement-su-599-2019-victims-sexual-violence-armed-conflict
  47. Constitutional Court – Judgement SU 599 - 2019 (victims of sexual violence in armed conflict) [Internet]. IHL Databases. 2019. Available from: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/national-practice/constitutional-court-judgement-su-599-2019-victims-sexual-violence-armed-conflict
  48. Ongwen Case. The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen, ICC-02/04-01/15 [Internet]. International criminal court. 2024. Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/uganda/ongwen
  49. ECHR. Tysiąc v. Poland Application no. 5410/03 [Internet]. HUDOC. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76165
  50. ECHR. A, B, and C v. Ireland. Application No. 25579/05 [Internet]. HUDOC. 2010. Available from: https://hudoc. echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-102332
  51. ECHR. R.R. v. Poland. Application No. 27617/04 [Internet]. HUDOC. 2011. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-104911
  52. ECHR. K.H. and Others v. Slovakia. Application no. 32881/04 [Internet]. HUDOC. 2009. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-92418%22]}
  53. ECHR. V. C. vs. Slovakia Application no. 18968/07 [Internet]. HUDOC. 2012. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-107364
  54. ECHR. I.G, M.K, and R.H. v. Slovakia. Application No. 15966/04 [Internet]. HUDOC. 2013. Available from: https://hudoc. echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-114514
  55. ECHR. G.M. and Others v. the Republic of Moldova Application no. 44394/15 [Internet]. HUDOC. 2022 Nov. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-13897%22]}

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

Kovalchuk, V., Komarnytska І. І., Rizenko, O., Pasternak, V., & Kostiukova, I. (2025). Public health of the nation and reproductive violence. REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, (76), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2025.76.57-64

Issue

No. 76 (2025)

Section

Interdisciplinary problems

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.