Modern possibilities of organ-sparing treatment of uterine fibroid

Clinical case

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2024.75.17-24

Keywords:

uterine fibroids, embolization of uterine arteries, myomectomy, organ-preserving conservative methods, organ-preserving treatment

Abstract

Uterine fibroid is a benign tumor originating from myometrial cells, which due to the various exogenous and endogenous factors has the potential for rapid multi-localized growth, progression of clinical symptoms, and impact on the physical and mental health of women, leading to deterioration in their quality of life. It often impedes reproductive function, causing infertility and pregnancy loss.
Despite the availability and variety of conservative treatment methods, hysterectomy remains the treatment of choice for large uterine fibroids, which permanently deprives women of the possibility of childbearing.
This article presents a clinical case of successful organ-preserving treatment of a woman with a giant uterine fibroid.
A combined three-stage treatment was applied. Stage I – inducing medical menopause by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (goserelin 10.8 mg subcutaneously); stage II – uterine artery embolization during medical menopause; stage III – laparotomic conservative myomectomy with simultaneous abdominoplasty. One month after administering goserelin 10.8 mg, during medical menopause, the uterine volume reduced from 3257 to 2798 cm³ (a 14% decrease), and the fibroid volume from 1362 to 1065 cm³ (a 21.8% decrease). After uterine artery embolization, the uterine and fibroid volumes continued to decrease to 2424 cm³ (a 25% reduction) and 876 cm³ (a 35% reduction), respectively.
One month after uterine artery embolization, laparotomic myomectomy with abdominoplasty was performed. Following the surgery, the uterine volume decreased to 782 cm³ (a 76% reduction from the initial volume), and two months post-surgery, the uterus decreased to 58 cm³, reflecting a 98.2% reduction from the initial volume. During the postoperative rehabilitation period, to prevent abnormal uterine bleeding, recurrence of uterine fibroids, and to ensure effective contraception, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was placed.
Conclusions. Organ-preserving conservative methods offer a safe and accessible treatment option for women with uterine fibroids who have not yet fulfilled their reproductive plans. The described combination of methods makes it possible to preserve the uterus and realize the reproductive function.

Author Biographies

N.V. Kosei, SSI “Center for Innovative Medical Technologies of the NAS of Ukraine”; SI «Ukrainian Center of Maternity and Childhood of the NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv

MD, professor, head of the Department of Reproductive Health;
chief researcher, Endocrine Gynecology Department

T.F. Tatarchuk, «Ukrainian Center of Maternity and Childhood of the NAMS of Ukraine»; SSI “Center for Innovative Medical Technologies of the NAS of Ukraine”, Kyiv

MD, professor, corresponding member of the NAMS of Ukraine, deputy director for research work, head of the Endocrine Gynecology Department;
chief researcher, Department of Reproductive Health

K.D. Plaksiieva, SSI “Center for Innovative Medical Technologies of the NAS of Ukraine”, Kyiv

PhD., senior researcher, Department of Reproductive Health

O.A. Vlasenko, Thoraco-Abdominal Oncology at the Oncological Surgery Clinic, State Enterprise “National Cancer Institute»; «Verum Expert Clinic», Kyiv

PhD, vascular surgeon, Department of Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Surgery, Interventional Radiology of the Scientific and Clinical Division;
Endovascular surgeon

K.E. Melnyk, SI «Ukrainian Center of Maternity and Childhood of the NAMS of Ukraine», Kyiv

Gynecologist, Endocrine Gynecology Department

H.A. Tokar, O.O. Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

Student

References

  1. Machado-Lopez A, Alonso R, Lago V, et al. Integrative genomic and transcriptomic profiling reveals a differential molecular signature in uterine leiomyoma versus leiomyosarcoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(4):2190. DOI:10.3390/ijms23042190
  2. Miyazaki R, Hoka S, Yamaura K. Visceral fat, but not subcutaneous fat, is associated with lower core temperature during laparoscopic surgery. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(6). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218281.
  3. Qin H, Lin Z, Vásquez E, et al. Association between obesity and the risk of uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiology Community Health. 2021 Feb;75(2):197–204. DOI:10.1136/jech-2019-213364
  4. Sun K, Xie Y, Zhao N, Li Z. A case-control study of the relationship between visceral fat and development of uterine fibroids. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18(1):404–10. DOI:10.3892/etm.2019.7575
  5. AlAshqar A, Patzkowsky K, Afrin S, Wild R, Taylor HS, Borahay MA. Cardiometabolic risk factors and benign gynecologic disorders. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2019;74(11):661–73. DOI:10.1097/OGX.0000000000000718.
  6. Soave I, Marci R. From obesity to uterine fibroids: An intricate network. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2018;34(11):1877–9. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1505606. Epub 2018. PMID: 30049230.
  7. Go VA, Thomas MC, Singh B, Prenatt S, Sims H, Blanck JF, Segars JH. A systematic review of the psychosocial impact of fibroids before and after treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(5):674-708. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.044
  8. Spyropoulou K, Kosmas I, Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Kalogiannidis I, Athanasiadis A, Daponte A, Dagklis T. Myomectomy during pregnancy: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Amp Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;254:15–24. DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.018
  9. Yang Q, Ciebiera M, Bariani MV, Ali M, Elkafas H, Boyer TG, Al-Hendy A. Comprehensive review of uterine fibroids: developmental origin, pathogenesis, and treatment. Endocr Rev. 2021;43(4):678–719 DOI:10.1210/endrev/bnab039.

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Kosei, N., Tatarchuk, T., Plaksiieva, K., Vlasenko, O., Melnyk, K., & Tokar, H. (2024). Modern possibilities of organ-sparing treatment of uterine fibroid: Clinical case. REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, (75), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2024.75.17-24

Issue

Section

Статті