The “brain-sparing” effect and thromboelastometric features of newborns with growth retardation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2024.73.45-50

Keywords:

fetal growth retardation, prematurity, coagulation, fibrinolysis, endothelium

Abstract

Background. The phenomenon of «brain-sparing» is usually seen as a protective response to placental insufficiency. However, there are many reasons to consider the protectiveness insufficient, even questionable. For example, due to the high incidence of hemorrhagic complications
in newborns. Increased cerebral perfusion may be associated with postnatal functional and structural complications. A deficient intrauterine environment increases the risk of coronary heart disease, hypertension, stroke, and metabolic syndrome.
Objective of the study: to investigate an elastometric blood coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters in newborns with intrauterine growth retardation.
Materials and methods. 42 children born at 28–34 weeks and 20 full-term babies with spectral dopplerometric blood flow in maternal and fetal vascular pools (uterine, umbilical and middle cerebral arteries) performed within 24–48 hours before birth were divided into three groups. The main group (group I) included 24 newborns in the period of 28-34 weeks with growth retardation. Comparison groups: 18 premature infants of the appropriate term without growth retardation (group II), 20 healthy full-term infants (group III).
Blood samples from umbilical arteries were examined by the method of rotational thromboelastometry with the feb-tem® reagent. The parameters of volumetric blood flow in the specified vascular basins were determined by the Doppler ultrasound examination.
Results. Synchronous acceleration of blood flow and a moderate decrease in resistance were observed in all the examined basins, except for the middle cerebral artery in fetuses with growth retardation, which fits into the definition of «brain spare». They also showed elastometric signs of increased coagulation ability – increased blood clot density and delayed blood lysis.
Conclusions. The appearance of Doppler signs of the middle cerebral artery dilation and slowing of blood flow in its basin should be regarded as an advanced violation of the blood supply. The tendency to increase coagulation and slow fibrinolysis in neonates with growth retardation further complicates their neonatal prognosis. Such newborns require monitoring of the blood coagulation system and fibrinolysis in the early neonatal period.

Author Biographies

S.S. Leush, O.O. Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

PhD, associate professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1

O.Y. Slobodianyk, O.O. Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

PhD, associate professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1

S.V. Osadchuk, O.O. Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv

Assistant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1

A.G. Ter-Tumasova, Communal Non-Commercial Enterprise “Kyiv perinatal center”, Kyiv

Obstetrician-gynecologist

References

  1. Scherjon SA, Smolders-DeHaas H, Kok JH, Zondervan HA. The «brain-sparing» effect: antenatal cerebral Doppler findings in relation to neurologic outcome in very preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169(1):169–75. DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90156-d
  2. Takahashi Y, Kawabata I, Tamaya T. Characterization of growth-restricted fetuses with breakdown of the brain-sparing effect diagnosed by spectral Doppler. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001;10(2):122–6. DOI:10.1080/714052730
  3. Hernandez-Andrade E, Serralde JA, Cruz-Martinez R. Can anomalies of fetal brain circulation be useful in the management of growth restricted fetuses?. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(2):103–12. DOI:10.1002/pd.2913
  4. Cohen E, Baerts W, van Bel F. Brain-Sparing in Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Considerations for the Neonatologist. Neonatology. 2015;108(4):269–76. DOI: 10.1159/000438451.
  5. Benítez-Marín MJ, Marín-Clavijo J, Blanco-Elena JA, et al. Brain Sparing Effect on Neurodevelopment in Children with Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Systematic Review. Children (Basel). 2021 Aug 28;8(9):745. DOI: 10.3390/children8090745.
  6. Nishiyama A, Kitada K, Suzuki M. Blood pressure adaptation in vertebrates: comparative biology. Kidney Int. 2022 Aug;102(2):242–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.03.032.
  7. Hernandez-Andrade E, Stampalija T, Figueras F. Cerebral blood flow studies in the diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth restriction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;25(2):138–44. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835e0e9c.
  8. Steller JG, Gumina D, Driver C, et al. Patterns of Brain Sparing in a Fetal Growth Restriction Cohort. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 1;11(15):4480. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154480.
  9. Buckenham TM, Wright IA. Ultrasound of the extracranial vertebral artery. Br J Radiol. 2004 Jan;77(913):15–20. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/70447093.
  10. van den Broek AJ, Kok JH, Houtzager BA, Scherjon SA. Behavioural problems at the age of eleven years in preterm-born children with or without fetal brain sparing: a prospective cohort study. Early Hum Dev. 2010 Jun;86(6):379–84. DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.04.007.
  11. Su EJ. Scaling the EVERREST of severe, early-onset fetal growth restriction. J Clin Invest. 2023 Sep 15;133(18):e173563. DOI: 10.1172/JCI173563.
  12. Shin JA, Lee JY, Yum SK. Echocardiographic assessment of brain sparing in smallfor-gestational age infants and association with neonatal outcomes. Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 23;13(1):10248. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37376-7.
  13. Leal CRV, Rezende KP, Macedo EDCP, et al. Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;45(2):96–103. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764493.
  14. Drotarova M, Zolkova J, Belakova KM, et al. Basic Principles of Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) and the Role of ROTEM-Guided Fibrinogen Replacement Therapy in the Management of Coagulopathies. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(20):3219. Published 2023 Oct 16. DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13203219
  15. Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007;30(3):247–366. DOI: 10.1002/uog.4088.
  16. Konje JC, Abrams KR, Taylor DJ. Normative values of Doppler velocimetry of five major fetal arteries as determined by color power angiography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Mar;84(3):230–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00549.x.
  17. Cruz-Martinez R, Tenorio V, Padilla N, et al. Risk of ultrasound-detected neonatal brain abnormalities in intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses born between 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation: relationship with gestational age at birth and fetal Doppler parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):452–9. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14920.
  18. Spencer R, Maksym K, Hecher K, et al. Maternal PlGF and umbilical Dopplers predict pregnancy outcomes at diagnosis of early-onset fetal growth restriction. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(18):e169199. DOI:10.1172/JCI169199
  19. Xodo S, Celante L, Liviero S, et al. Fetal growth at term and placental oxidative stress in a tissue micro-array model: a histological and immunohistochemistry study. Histochem Cell Biol. 2023;160(4):293–306. DOI:10.1007/s00418-023-02212-6
  20. Meler E, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Caradeux J, et al. Severe smallness as predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in suspected late small-for-gestational-age fetuses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;60(3):328–37. DOI: 10.1002/uog.24977.
  21. Katsaras GΝ, Sokou R, Tsantes AG, et al. The use of thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in neonates: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Dec;180(12):3455–70. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04154-4.
  22. Karapati E, Valsami S, Sokou R, et al. Hemostatic Profile of Intrauterine Growth-Restricted Neonates: Assessment with the Use of NATEM Assay in Cord Blood Samples. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 13;14(2):178. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14020178.
  23. Olofsson P. Umbilical cord pH, blood gases, and lactate at birth: normal values, interpretation, and clinical utility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May; 228(5S): S1222–S1240. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.001.
  24. Figueras F, Gratacos E. An integrated approach to fetal growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jan;38:48–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.10.006.
  25. Kravchenko О.V. Placental dysfunction as a basic pathology of perinatal complications. Reproductive Endocrinology, 2021 Apr 2(58):107–112. DOI: 10.18370/2309-4117.2021.58.107-112
  26. Bruin C, Damhuis S, Gordijn S, Ganzevoort W. Evaluation and Management of Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Jun;48(2):371–385. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.02.007.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-18

How to Cite

Leush, S., Slobodianyk, O., Osadchuk, S., & Ter-Tumasova, A. (2024). The “brain-sparing” effect and thromboelastometric features of newborns with growth retardation. REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, (73), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.18370/2309-4117.2024.73.45-50

Issue

No. 73 (2024)

Section

Pregnancy and childbirth

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.