The anterior uterocervical angle as a new ultrasound marker of preterm labor in pregnant women with a history of endocrine and combined infertility




pregnancy after infertility, anterior uterocervical angle, cervical insufficiency


In women with endocrine and concomitant infertility there is a high frequency of the threat of termination of pregnancy at different periods, most often after stimulation of ovulation or as a result of assisted reproductive technologies, due to the formation of insufficiency of the luteal phase of the cycle in combination with hyperandrogenism and functional cervical insufficiency in every third pregnant woman. Regardless of the reasons, today there are no clear and early diagnostic criteria for this complication of pregnancy.
Research objective: to determine the informational significance of the uterocervical angle for predicting premature birth in women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of infertility.
Materials and methods. 127 women with singleton pregnancies aged 20–49 years underwent ultrasound at 12–14 and 16–20 weeks of gestation. The distribution of pregnant women into groups was based on the infertility factor: group I included 35 women with a history of endocrine infertility, group II included 37 pregnant women with a history of tubal-peritoneal infertility, group III included 25 women with a history of combined infertility (tubal-peritoneal infertility with endocrine), IV group (control) consist of 30 healthy pregnant women without a history of infertility.
Results. The frequency of the uterocervical angle > 96° in the first half of pregnancy was in 31.4% of pregnant women with a history of endocrine infertility, in 10.8% of women with tubal-peritoneal infertility and in 32% of patients with a history of combined infertility. Preterm birth occurred in 45.4% of women with a history of endocrine infertility, in 75% of pregnant women with tubal-peritoneal infertility, in 62.5% of women with a history of combined infertility when the uterinecervical angle > 96° was detected in the first half of pregnancy.
Conclusions. The uterocervical angle detected by ultrasound cervicometry in the first half of pregnancy in combination with other cervical parameters (length, state of the internal pharynx, etc.) improves the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency.

Author Biographies

L.E. Tumanova, SI “O.M. Lukyanova IPOG of the NAMS of Ukraine”, Kyiv

MD, professor, head of the Department of Prevention and Treatment of Pus-Inflammatory Diseases in Obstetrics

O.V. Kolomiiets, SI “O.M. Lukyanova IPOG of the NAMS of Ukraine”, Kyiv

PhD, senior researcher, Department of Prevention and Treatment of Pus-inflammatory Diseases in Obstetrics


  1. Astaf'eva, O.V., Karyakina, I.V., Aslanyan, E.A., Miheeva, N.V. “The uterocervical angle as an additional ultrasound marker for prediction of preterm birth.” Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin 26.6 (2018): 26–31.
  2. Baskakov, P.N., Torsuev, A.N., Tarkhan, M.O., Tatarinova, L.A. “Correction of cervical and cervical deficiencies in obstetric rehabilitation.” Protection of motherhood and childhood. Simferopol (2013): 50–2.
  3. Ventskovskaia, I.B., Belaia, V.V., Zagorodniaia, A.S. “Premature birth – problems and ways of solution.” Reproductive Health. Eastern Europe 4.28 (2013): 10–11.
  4. Kuzibaeva, R.K. “The length of the cervix as a predictor of premature birth.” Healthcare of Tajikistan 2 (2015): 55–62.
  5. Malanina, E.N., Davidyan, L.U., Kasymova, D.R., Khaitova, D.T. “Cervical transvaginal sonography capabilities in predicting preterm birth.” Modern problems of science and education 3 (2013): 97–100.
  6. Oleshko, V.F. Thesis for the candidate degree of medical sciences “Prevention of Obstetric and Perinatal Complications in the Pregnant Women with Obstructive Disorders of Uterus Cervix” (2017): 236.
  7. Arias, F. Arias Practical Guide to high-risk pregnancy and delivery: A South Asian Perspective / Arias, F., Bhide, A., Arulkumaran, et al. (4th Ed) (2015) Chapter 8: 135.
  8. Banicevic, A.C., Popovic, M., Ceric, A. “Cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography and cervicovaginal infection as predictor of preterm birth risk.” Acta Inform Med 22.2 (2014): 128–32. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2014.22.128-132
  9. Belizán, J.M., Hofmeyr, J., Buekens, P., Salaria, N. “Preterm birth, an unresolved issue.” Reprod Health 10.1 (2013 Nov 15): 58. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-58
  10. Boelig, R.C., Orzechowski, K.M., Berghella, V. “Cervical length, risk factors, and delivery outcomes among women with spontaneous preterm birth.” J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29.17 (2016): 2840–4. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1105957
  11. Campbell, S. “Universal cervical-length screening and vaginal progesterone prevents early preterm births, reduces neonatal morbidity and is cost saving: doing nothing is no longer an option.” Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38 (2011): 1–9. DOI: 10.1002/uog.9073
  12. Campbell Westerway, S., Henning Pedersen, L., Hyett, J. “Cervical length measurement: Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approach.” Australas J Ultrasound Med 18.1 (2015): 19–26. DOI: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2015.tb00019.x
  13. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 1: CD007235.
  14. Cervical scan. The Fetal Medicine Centre; 2018. Available from: [].
  15. Dziadosz, M., Bennett, T.A., Dolin, C., et al. “Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth.” Am J Obstet Gynecol 215.3 (2016 Sep.): 376.e1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.033
  16. Howson, C.P., Kinney, M.V., McDougall, L. et al. “Born Toon Soon: Preterm birth matters.” Reprod Health 10.1 (2013): S1.
  17. Iams, J.D., Goldenberg, R.L., Meis, P.J., et al. “The length of the cervix the risk of spontaneous premature delivery.” N Engl J Medicine 334 (1996): 567–73. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199602293340904
  18. Llobet, F., Regincós, M., Higueras, C.F., et al. “The uterocervical angle and its relationship with preterm birth.” J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 31.14 (2018 Jul): 1881–4. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1331427
  19. Mazaki-Tovi, S., Romero, R., Kusanovic, J.P., et al. “Recurrent preterm birth.” Semin Perinatol 31.3 (2007): 142–58. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.04.001
  20. O'Hara, S., Zelesco, M., Sun, Z. “Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques.” Australas J Ultrasound Med 16.3 (2013 Aug): 124–34. DOI: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2013.tb00100.x
  21. Hernandez-Andrade, E., Roberto, R., Ahn, H., et al. “Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix.” J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25.9 (2012 Sep): 1682–9. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.657278
  22. Sepúlveda-Martínez, A., Díaz, F., Muñoz, H., et al. “Second-Trimester Anterior Cervical Angle in a Low-Risk Population as a Marker for Spontaneous Preterm Delivery.” Fetal Diagn Ther 41.3 (2017): 220–5. DOI: 10.1159/000447588
  23. Sochacki-Wojcicka, N., Wojcicki, J., Bomba-Opon, D., Wielgos, M. “Anterior cervical angle as a new biophysical ultrasound marker for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth.” Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46.3 (2015): 377–8. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14801
  24. Sur, B. et al. “Evaluation of the anterior cervical angle of the uterus to predict spontaneous preterm birth.” Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 6.6 (2017 Jun): 2323–7. DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172114



How to Cite

Tumanova, L., & Kolomiiets, O. (2021). The anterior uterocervical angle as a new ultrasound marker of preterm labor in pregnant women with a history of endocrine and combined infertility. REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, (60), 34–38.



Pregnancy and childbirth